From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.ebshome.net (gate.ebshome.net [64.81.67.12]) (using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits)) (Client CN "gate.ebshome.net", Issuer "gate.ebshome.net" (not verified)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5216B67A67 for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2005 21:17:21 +1000 (EST) Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 03:17:19 -0800 From: Eugene Surovegin To: Li Yang-r58472 Message-ID: <20050331111718.GA31467@gate.ebshome.net> References: <9FCDBA58F226D911B202000BDBAD46730117355F@zch01exm40.ap.freescale.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <9FCDBA58F226D911B202000BDBAD46730117355F@zch01exm40.ap.freescale.net> Cc: Linux PPC Embedded list Subject: Re: Problem running Linux 2.6.11 on MPC8272ADS List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 04:22:26PM +0800, Li Yang-r58472 wrote: > Good point. > There is also IMMR need to be passed from bootloader to kernel. We > can make more use of the u-boot bd_info mechanism. But it binds ppc > linux to u-boot boot loader. I don't know if we should make it a > porting convention. Well, immr is _already_ part of bd_t passed from U-Boot! I was surprised that none of board ports (some of which are made for U-Boot only) use this. In 8248 based board port I'm working on right now, I already defined CPM_MAP_ADDR as follows: #define CPM_MAP_ADDR (((bd_t*)__res)->bi_immr_base) -- Eugene