From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.ebshome.net (gate.ebshome.net [64.81.67.12]) (using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits)) (Client CN "gate.ebshome.net", Issuer "gate.ebshome.net" (not verified)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1365167A33 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 02:12:34 +1000 (EST) Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 09:12:29 -0700 From: Eugene Surovegin To: llandre Message-ID: <20050406161229.GA18166@gate.ebshome.net> References: <6.0.1.1.0.20050406093338.01eb9d48@192.168.2.1> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <6.0.1.1.0.20050406093338.01eb9d48@192.168.2.1> Cc: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org Subject: Re: Status of Linux 2.6 for 40x and 44x CPUs List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 09:41:27AM +0200, llandre wrote: > I found some messages about the status of 2.6 kernel for MPC8xx-based > machines but > I found nothing about 40x and 44x CPU. So what? Absence of such messages doesn't mean 4xx doesn't work, I'd say quite the opposite. > Anybody can tell me something about > it? Did it > get production stable? If not, which are the areas that are under heavy > development? 4xx is quite stable, although I'm not sure many people use 2.6 in production. -- Eugene