From: Tom Rini <trini@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Fillod Stephane <stephane.fillod@thomson.net>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] invalid instructions in kernel mode
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 10:38:21 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050407173821.GQ3396@smtp.west.cox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1CFEB358338412458B21FAA0D78FE86D4F0D23@rennsmail02.eu.thmulti.com>
On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 07:47:32PM +0200, Fillod Stephane wrote:
> When CPU has no (classic) FPU, and math emulation is disabled,
> fp instructions are not allowed in kernel mode.
[snip]
> --- linux/arch/ppc/kernel/misc.S 26 Mar 2005 03:28:36 -0000
> 1.1.1.2
> +++ linux/arch/ppc/kernel/misc.S 31 Mar 2005 16:33:25 -0000
> @@ -1096,7 +1096,8 @@
> * and exceptions as if the cpu had performed the load or store.
> */
>
> -#if defined(CONFIG_4xx) || defined(CONFIG_E500)
> +#if !(defined(CONFIG_4xx) || defined(CONFIG_E500) ||
> defined(CONFIG_8xx)) || defined(CONFIG_MATH_EMULATION)
> +#if defined(CONFIG_4xx) || defined(CONFIG_E500)
> _GLOBAL(cvt_fd)
> lfs 0,0(r3)
> stfd 0,0(r4)
> @@ -1125,6 +1126,7 @@
> stfd 0,-4(r5)
> blr
> #endif
> +#endif
The problem here is, HEY! (classic) FP instrs in the kernel. The
question is why? Or rather, why are these four classic FP instrs
(lfs/lfd/stfd/stfs) being done on CONFIG_4xx || E500 when neither has
classic FP? I think the problem here is that on !FPU
(which is 4xx||E500||8xx, or so), we need to rewrite these two
functions (yes, 8xx does emulate them if hit, but that's a tangent).
--
Tom Rini
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-04-07 17:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-03-31 17:47 [PATCH] invalid instructions in kernel mode Fillod Stephane
2005-03-31 18:15 ` Dan Malek
2005-04-01 10:04 ` Kumar Gala
2005-04-07 17:38 ` Tom Rini [this message]
2005-04-07 21:41 ` Kumar Gala
2005-04-07 22:14 ` Tom Rini
2005-04-07 22:29 ` Kumar Gala
2005-04-08 16:02 ` Kumar Gala
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-03-31 19:17 Fillod Stephane
2005-04-01 3:45 ` Dan Malek
2005-04-05 12:24 Fillod Stephane
2005-04-05 16:16 ` Dan Malek
2005-04-05 12:25 Fillod Stephane
2005-04-08 17:36 Fillod Stephane
2005-04-11 15:39 ` Kumar Gala
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050407173821.GQ3396@smtp.west.cox.net \
--to=trini@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=stephane.fillod@thomson.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).