From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from fed1rmmtao08.cox.net (fed1rmmtao08.cox.net [68.230.241.31]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AB5167B1B for ; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 00:50:41 +1000 (EST) Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 07:50:29 -0700 From: Tom Rini To: Marcelo Tosatti Message-ID: <20050425145029.GD3112@smtp.west.cox.net> References: <20050413195713.GF11131@logos.cnet> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20050413195713.GF11131@logos.cnet> Cc: linux-ppc-embedded Subject: Re: [RFC] attempt to remove misc-embedded.c List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 04:57:13PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > > Hi Tom, > > This is an attempt to move remove misc-embedded.c by moving its quirks to > misc.c. > > It needs further fixing and cleaning, for sure. I like the idea of deleting misc-embedded.c, but I don't think we should haven't make many changes to misc.c (except perhaps abstracting away a few more hunks of it) as I _think_ most of the cpu-specific stuff can be moved around now to the misc-board.c files. > Are there any major disagreements about the change? > Might need to define a bd_t structure for all ppc's? That's something to be left for the flat OF tree thread. :) -- Tom Rini http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/