Re: rsync mirrors of linuxppc-* on source.mvista.com

[Tom Rini <trini@kernel.crashing.org>]

On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 12:02:13PM -0400, Dan Malek wrote:
> 
> On Apr 28, 2005, at 11:37 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
> 
> >....  is there any value in keeping
> >the rsync mirrors of the last state of the linuxppc-* trees available?
> 
> Have you been pulling any updates into these trees?

They are semi current with the linux-2.[46] versions, but probably not
100% up to date.

> I would like to keep an archive copy, as there is still code in them
> that hasn't migrated into main trees.  I guess the longer we wait
> the less value that has, but I'd like to not lose it.  I don' t have
> any problem hosting the archives if people still want to use them
> for future reference.

For the linuxppc-2.5 tree, I did a dirdiff'ing prior
to the BK thing comming up and either submitted things, or gave to Paul
/ Matt Porter what I found (as it was 4xx things) to deal with.

For the linuxppc-2.4 tre, I know there's stuff that never went to
Marcelo.

I'll go re-activate rsync for the trees and have a comment about them
being historical archives.

-- 
Tom Rini
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/