linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Absolut Hunter" <absoluthunter@comcast.net>
To: <linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org>
Subject: Linux 2.4.25 / MPC8280 / ram config vs Linux instability?
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 07:02:14 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050711140714.C743F67C23@ozlabs.org> (raw)


A useful piece to this might be that I am attempting to map these two memory
regions contiguously, so that Linux doesn't see any memory holes.

0-2MB SRAM
2MB-34MB SDRAM

I would be open to any other ways that SRAM / SDRAM might be mapped to work,
and still provide a performance increase for the kernel.

-Russell

-----Original Message-----
From: Absolut Hunter [mailto:absoluthunter@comcast.net] 
Sent: Monday, July 11, 2005 6:38 AM
To: 'linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org'
Subject: Linux 2.4.25 / MPC8280 / ram config vs Linux instability?

Anybody,

I ran into a peculiar issue, though it could be user error. 

I am using U-boot to configure up the SDRAM and SRAM in our system before we
launch Linux. We have 32 Mb of SDRAM and 2 MB of SRAM in the system. 

If I leave the SRAM mapped at higher addresses 0x10000000 and SDRAM at
0x00000000, like U-boot defaults to Linux works great. However, my goal is
to map SRAM <8ns speeds> down to the address 0x00000000, to map the vector
table, so I can achieve a very fast interrupt response time.

I hacked U-boot a little bit to remap these addresses, after all the init
code was finished. U-boot relocates itself to higher memory, i.e. the last
2MB's of SDRAM and all is well within U-boot. I ran a 14 hour test on the
memory area to proof it. Now we have 0x02200000 <34M> memory size being
reported to Linux, in the bd->memsize. However, now Linux crashes randomly
all over the place, mostly sig11's task: swapper. I know this is not an
issue with SDRAM stability, and I can't imagine SRAM having problems seeing
as its 8ns capable and we're running at 15ns at the moment (66mhz).

Linux reports BAT mappings as BAT2=32Mb, BAT3=2MB when all 34 Megs are
presented via U-boot. 

Does anyone have any idea what would cause this instability? Physically all
memory seems to be great if used by itself. I know very little about how
Linux manages its pages, BATS, TBLs, etc... Are the limits on odd memory
sizes? Or certain configurations that it expects to see?

Thanks in advance.

-Russell McGuire

             reply	other threads:[~2005-07-11 14:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-07-11 14:02 Absolut Hunter [this message]
2005-07-11 14:39 ` Linux 2.4.25 / MPC8280 / ram config vs Linux instability? Michael Richardson
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-07-11 13:59 Steven Blakeslee
2005-07-11 13:38 Absolut Hunter
2005-07-11 14:01 ` Michael Richardson
2005-07-11 14:03 ` Mark Chambers
2005-07-11 14:22 ` Wolfgang Denk
2005-07-11 18:39 ` Dan Malek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050711140714.C743F67C23@ozlabs.org \
    --to=absoluthunter@comcast.net \
    --cc=linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).