From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mailout09.sul.t-online.com (mailout09.sul.t-online.com [194.25.134.84]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32F4867C7F for ; Wed, 20 Jul 2005 04:45:09 +1000 (EST) To: David Ho From: Wolfgang Denk Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 19 Jul 2005 08:57:20 EDT." <4dd15d1805071905573ebcba61@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 20:42:41 +0200 Sender: wd@denx.de Message-Id: <20050719184241.78430352671@atlas.denx.de> Cc: David Jander , linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org Subject: Re: How reliable is jffs2 really (denx cvs devel kernel)? List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , In message <4dd15d1805071905573ebcba61@mail.gmail.com> you wrote: > > I updated the JFFS2 portion of the Denx devel kernel with the latest > from CVS and it solved the initial mount time problem. But it was a > while a ago when I did this. Both the devel kernel and the CVS head > has changed quite a bit since then. I would rally appreciate if you mentioned which exact version of the kernel you are talking about. "The Denx devel kernel" can be anything - either yesterday or 3 years old. At the moment our CVS tree contains a snapshot from MTD CVS of March 13, 2005; yes, we did the necessary backport to the 2.4 kernel. Do you want to say that this version still has mount time issues? Please provide details! Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- Software Engineering: Embedded and Realtime Systems, Embedded Linux Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd@denx.de The word "fit", as I understand it, means "appropriate to a purpose", and I would say the body of the Dean is supremely appropriate to the purpose of sitting around all day and eating big heavy meals. - Terry Pratchett, _Moving Pictures_