From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from fed1rmmtao04.cox.net (fed1rmmtao04.cox.net [68.230.241.35]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1CE067F06 for ; Sat, 6 Aug 2005 09:07:39 +1000 (EST) Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2005 16:07:35 -0700 From: Matt Porter To: Andrew Morton Message-ID: <20050805160735.B10842@cox.net> References: <20050805154505.A10842@cox.net> <20050805155442.4e3dbf8f.akpm@osdl.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20050805155442.4e3dbf8f.akpm@osdl.org>; from akpm@osdl.org on Fri, Aug 05, 2005 at 03:54:42PM -0700 Cc: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] ppc32: fix ppc440 pagetable attributes List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, Aug 05, 2005 at 03:54:42PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > Matt Porter wrote: > > > > This patch fixes a bug in the PPC440 pagetable attributes that breaks > > swap support. It also adds some notes on the PPC440 attribute fields. > > hm, that looks pretty serious, but it affects all ppc's, yes? Just PPC440. I originally organized the attributes incorrectly. > Is this needed for 2.6.13? Are you super-sure it's safe? This should go into 2.6.13. I doublechecked it by inspection and ran numerous tests. It's only existed this long (years) due to the fact that few people run a disk-based PPC440 system. I would have sent it up sooner except I wanted to be very sure of my testing since I don't always trust my own inspection. :) -Matt