From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 17:35:34 -0400
From: "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>
To: Dan Malek <dan@embeddededge.com>
Message-ID: <20050810213533.GA2353@tuxdriver.com>
References: <c237b7e878e0c32f421209fa37b7a156@freescale.com>
	<22fac6c20e1ee142606e4295722c2d1d@embeddededge.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In-Reply-To: <22fac6c20e1ee142606e4295722c2d1d@embeddededge.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Becky Bruce <becky.bruce@freescale.com>,
	linuxppc64-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: RFC: proposed arch/powerpc directory structure
List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List <linuxppc-dev.ozlabs.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev>,
	<mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@ozlabs.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev>
List-Post: <mailto:linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>
List-Help: <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@ozlabs.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev>,
	<mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@ozlabs.org?subject=subscribe>

On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 01:01:34PM -0400, Dan Malek wrote:

> inside of them.  Regardless of the build or management tools we use, I 
> still find it
> nice to keep a concise file name that is still descriptive, and take 
> advantage of
> the directory structure names to assist with this.

I'll second that, fwiw...

John
-- 
John W. Linville
linville@tuxdriver.com