From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 12:59:27 -0700 From: Tom Rini To: Becky Bruce Message-ID: <20050811195927.GX3187@smtp.west.cox.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: Cc: linuxppc64-dev@ozlabs.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org Subject: Re: RFC: proposed arch/powerpc directory structure List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 11:45:10AM -0500, Becky Bruce wrote: [snip] > platforms/ > - platform-specific code laid out in the following > directories: > pSeries/ > iSeries/ > pmac/ (both 32 and 64-bit) > classic32/ (platforms containing > 6xx/7xx/74xx/8240/8241/8245) > classic64/ (Maple?) I'm a bit ppc64-ignorant, but isn't 'pSeries' just a regular OpenFirmware-containing ppc64 box (like Maple) ? How about just 9xx/ for all of the ppc64's that have a 9xx in them (Maple), that aren't pmac (which is a class of its own). > 83xx/ (may collapse into classic 32 at some point) > 86xx/ (may collapse into classic 32 at some point) > pq2/ (may collapse into classic 32 at some point) PQ2 is the marketing name for 82xx, lets just call it 82xx. I don't like the idea of sticking subdirs in classic32/ either, but also can't think of a better name for the catchall of 7xx and 74xx boards. -- Tom Rini http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/