From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 13:18:21 -0700 From: Tom Rini To: Kumar Gala Message-ID: <20050811201821.GY3187@smtp.west.cox.net> References: <20050811195927.GX3187@smtp.west.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Gill Becky-BGILL , linuxppc64-dev@ozlabs.org Subject: Re: RFC: proposed arch/powerpc directory structure List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 03:13:30PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote: > > On Aug 11, 2005, at 2:59 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > > >On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 11:45:10AM -0500, Becky Bruce wrote: > > > >[snip] [snip] > >> 83xx/ (may collapse into classic 32 at some point) > >> 86xx/ (may collapse into classic 32 at some point) > >> pq2/ (may collapse into classic 32 at some point) > >> > > > >PQ2 is the marketing name for 82xx, lets just call it 82xx. > > The problem is that PQ2 describes a subset of 82xx (it nots > 8240/8241/8245). All the more reason imho to stick all 82xx stuff under '82xx', rather than classic32 or 'pq2'. > >I don't like the idea of sticking subdirs in classic32/ either, but > >also > >can't think of a better name for the catchall of 7xx and 74xx boards. > > I dont think we where planning on subdirs in classic32. I took "may collapse into classic 32 at some point" to mean "move into classic32/ at some point", for some reason. collapsing the content into classic32/ will bring us back to the bad-old-days of everything in platforms/ (or kernel/). -- Tom Rini http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/