linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Edelsohn <dje@watson.ibm.com>
To: Kumar Gala <kumar.gala@freescale.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev list <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>, linuxppc64-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER on ppc/ppc64?
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 00:03:16 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200508160403.j7G43Hd29692@makai.watson.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Message from Kumar Gala <kumar.gala@freescale.com> of "Mon, 15 Aug 2005 22:41:03 CDT." <473FD762-FB04-4B63-93E9-11931492AC60@freescale.com>

>>>>> Kumar Gala writes:

>> Because -fomit-frame-pointer and -fno-omit-frame-pointer have no
>> effect on ppc or ppc64, I assume. :)

Kumar> I'm assuming that's a guess.  The reason I ask that is my memory  
Kumar> serves correctly r31 is used as the frame pointer if compiled that  
Kumar> way.  Maybe some GCC expert can chime in.  I'll copy David Edelsohn  
Kumar> and see if I get a response :)

	I am missing some context here.  On both 32-bit PowerPC Linux
(PowerPC SVR4) and 64-bit PowerPC Linux, GPR r31 is used as the frame
pointer.  PowerPC does not have a dedicated frame pointer and the PowerPC
ABI does not require an independent frame pointer in a function at all
times, so it can be omitted by default.  If the frame pointer is not
referenced for any unique needs, uses of the frame pointer are adjusted to
reference the stack pointer.  GCC only retains the PowerPC frame pointer
when dynamic stack allocation (alloca) is used within a function.
-fomit-frame-pointer has no effect on PowerPC because it is enabled by
default.

David

  reply	other threads:[~2005-08-16  4:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-08-15 18:25 CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER on ppc/ppc64? Kumar Gala
2005-08-15 23:08 ` Paul Mackerras
2005-08-16  3:41   ` Kumar Gala
2005-08-16  4:03     ` David Edelsohn [this message]
2005-08-16  5:23       ` Paul Mackerras
2005-08-16  9:44     ` Segher Boessenkool

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200508160403.j7G43Hd29692@makai.watson.ibm.com \
    --to=dje@watson.ibm.com \
    --cc=kumar.gala@freescale.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=linuxppc64-dev@ozlabs.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).