From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 08:30:13 -0700 From: Tom Rini To: Kumar Gala Message-ID: <20050817153013.GO8214@smtp.west.cox.net> References: <20050817150536.GN8214@smtp.west.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: Cc: linuxppc-dev list , David Woodhouse , linuxppc-embedded list Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use platform device for 8250 registration List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 10:22:54AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote: > >So long as you convert arch/ppc/boot/ to this as well, why not (or at > >least being able to grab the infos from these structs somehow). > > > >Once everyone is on a flat tree, I don't object to killing all of the > >old-style uart definitions steaming out of . > > Tom, do have a test system that I can look at converting that you > would be willing to test the changes to arch/ppc/boot for me. With Matt's patch, you could boot a PReP kernel (no VGA con) :) But if you convert LoPEC, I'll throw the kernel at it. -- Tom Rini http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/