From: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use platform device for 8250 registration
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 17:46:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050817174600.A22040@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1124296771.3869.74.camel@localhost.localdomain>; from dwmw2@infradead.org on Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 05:39:30PM +0100
On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 05:39:30PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-08-17 at 12:11 +0100, Russell King wrote:
> > Doesn't PPC64 have NO_IRQ ?
>
> PPC64 does but I find no definition of is_real_interrupt() other than
> the bogus one in 8250.c which checks for zero. PPC32 does not -- let's
> clean that one up separately.
Ok. I'll give you this line now for this patch:
Acked-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
so you're free to push it upstream whenever you deem is the right time.
Thanks.
--
Russell King
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-08-17 16:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-08-16 16:21 [PATCH] Use platform device for 8250 registration David Woodhouse
2005-08-17 6:30 ` Kumar Gala
2005-08-17 6:34 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-08-17 7:31 ` David Woodhouse
2005-08-17 13:54 ` Kumar Gala
2005-08-17 15:05 ` Tom Rini
2005-08-17 15:22 ` Kumar Gala
2005-08-17 15:30 ` Tom Rini
2005-08-17 16:16 ` Kumar Gala
2005-08-17 16:27 ` Matt Porter
2005-08-17 16:35 ` Tom Rini
2005-08-17 16:27 ` Tom Rini
2005-08-17 11:11 ` Russell King
2005-08-17 16:39 ` David Woodhouse
2005-08-17 16:46 ` Russell King [this message]
2005-08-17 14:00 ` When are machine checks suppose to be recoverable? Kumar Gala
2005-08-17 21:44 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-08-17 22:30 ` David Woodhouse
2005-08-18 3:42 ` Kumar Gala
2005-08-23 2:56 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2005-08-23 16:43 ` David Woodhouse
2005-08-23 17:04 ` Kumar Gala
2005-08-23 23:10 ` David Woodhouse
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050817174600.A22040@flint.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).