From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2005 13:13:32 -0700 From: Tom Rini To: Arnd Bergmann Message-ID: <20050824201332.GD15735@smtp.west.cox.net> References: <20050822141235.GA7110@austin.ibm.com> <20050824182020.GB15735@smtp.west.cox.net> <200508242203.27210.arnd@arndb.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <200508242203.27210.arnd@arndb.de> Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, linuxppc64-dev@ozlabs.org, Stephen Rothwell Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] Move all the very similar files List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 10:03:26PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Middeweken 24 August 2005 20:20, Tom Rini wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 12:05:36PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote: > > > > > > This seems reasonable then to have them in include/asm-powerpc. I > > > > No it doesn't. You can easily make the drivers get the includes from > > , arch/$(ARCH) is already always in the search > > path, I believe (if not, it's easy to add Makefile things to get it). > > I don't think any architecture except ppc32 has traditionally had > arch/$ARCH in its include path, and it would probably come as a surprise > to many kernel developers if this were used more. True, but it's possible that the pmac drivers could also be converted to use something else to pass around infos, register IO and such so the headers can still live in arch/powerpc/platforms/pmac/ -- Tom Rini http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/