From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.ebshome.net (gate.ebshome.net [64.81.67.12]) (using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits)) (Client CN "gate.ebshome.net", Issuer "gate.ebshome.net" (not verified)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E62868113 for ; Tue, 6 Sep 2005 12:38:18 +1000 (EST) Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2005 19:38:16 -0700 From: Eugene Surovegin To: viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk Message-ID: <20050906023816.GB5512@gate.ebshome.net> References: <20050906004423.GO5155@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20050906021535.GA5512@gate.ebshome.net> <20050906022733.GU5155@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20050906022733.GU5155@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] missed s/u32/pm_message_t/ in arch/ppc/syslib/ocp.c List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 03:27:33AM +0100, viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk wrote: > On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 07:15:35PM -0700, Eugene Surovegin wrote: > > > Identical fix is already in -mm > > Then it really should go upstream; obvious fixes like that are not > something that needs filtration... Well, it's not up to me, really - I just follow our usual patch submit procedure (i.e. send everything to Andrew). However, patch was sent today in the morning (PDT), so I think Andrew will forward it to Linus soon. -- Eugene