linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Dale Farnsworth" <dale@farnsworth.org>
To: Sven Luther <sl@bplan-gmbh.de>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.14-rc3 1/1] chrp_pegasos_eth: Added Marvell Discovery II SRAM support
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 14:42:17 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051014214217.GA29529@xyzzy.farnsworth.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051014151830.GA31442@localhost.localdomain>

On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 05:18:30PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 01:56:41PM -0000, Dale Farnsworth wrote:
> > > -	static struct pci_device_id pci_marvell_mv64360[] = {
> > > +	static struct pci_device_id pci_marvell_mv64360[] =
> > > +	{
> > 
> > > +	if (pci_dev_present(pci_marvell_mv64360))
> > > +	{
> > 
> > Open brace should not be on a line by itself except in function definitions.
> 
> Oh, neat, i knew i should not use same-line-braces for function but didn't
> know i should use them for non-functions :)

???

I guess what I wrote wasn't clear, since in his most recent patch,
Nicolas added more places like the above where the "{" has been moved
to a line by itself.  Just the opposite of what I meant to suggest.

>From Documentation/CodingStyle:
>		Chapter 3: Placing Braces
>
>The other issue that always comes up in C styling is the placement of
>braces.  Unlike the indent size, there are few technical reasons to
>choose one placement strategy over the other, but the preferred way, as
>shown to us by the prophets Kernighan and Ritchie, is to put the opening
>brace last on the line, and put the closing brace first, thusly:
>
>	if (x is true) {
>		we do y
>	}
>
>However, there is one special case, namely functions: they have the
>opening brace at the beginning of the next line, thus:
>
>	int function(int x)
>	{
>		body of function
>	}

-Dale

  reply	other threads:[~2005-10-14 21:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-10-13 20:00 [PATCH 2.6.14-rc3 1/1] chrp_pegasos_eth: Added Marvell Discovery II SRAM support Nicolas DET
2005-10-14  6:50 ` Nicolas DET
2005-10-14 13:56 ` Dale Farnsworth
2005-10-14 15:18   ` Sven Luther
2005-10-14 21:42     ` Dale Farnsworth [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-10-14 17:38 Nicolas DET
2005-10-14 17:45 ` Nicolas DET

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20051014214217.GA29529@xyzzy.farnsworth.org \
    --to=dale@farnsworth.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=sl@bplan-gmbh.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).