From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from Redstar.dorchain.net (153-133-088-212.ip-addr.teresto.net [212.88.133.153]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.dorchain.net", Issuer "Dorchain Family" (not verified)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAE65685D6 for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 18:56:03 +1000 (EST) Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 10:49:35 +0200 From: Joerg Dorchain To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Message-ID: <20051018084935.GE28756@Redstar.dorchain.net> References: <20051014123823.GA9477@Redstar.dorchain.net> <1129327105.21765.39.camel@gaston> <20051016081759.GA2609@Redstar.dorchain.net> <1129452167.7620.34.camel@gaston> <20051017183443.GB28756@Redstar.dorchain.net> <1129585466.7620.90.camel@gaston> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="rqzD5py0kzyFAOWN" In-Reply-To: <1129585466.7620.90.camel@gaston> Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org Subject: Re: 2.6.13 ati (ibook) frambuffer problem List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , --rqzD5py0kzyFAOWN Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 07:44:26AM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > The 2.6.12 version worked. Would it make sense to post the complete > > .config? I got 2.6.13.4 booting. The last change I did was deselecting CONFIG_FB_TILEBLITTING. Unfortunately, I have no idea how this actually affects the ATI frambebuffer.=20 To make it even more strange, after reenabling CONFIG_FB_TILEBLITTING, it still boots up cleanly. Obviously, I missed out on something. Besides, I have the impression that the disk reacts slower. As hdparm does not tell a difference, it might be due the coffein, tough. >=20 > Nope. What may help is a bit more debugging. For example, does the > kernel actually boots if you add "video=3Dofonly" to the kernel command > line. No effect. Well, the good point is, it works again. The bad point, I do not know why. Anyway, thanks for the support. Bye, Joerg --rqzD5py0kzyFAOWN Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDVLcfjY4+4PdzvOARAkjZAJ47CvJ/8pp7KkBr/9HUgN53UJTynACfRfqO +TcuvpGzwHXvfbvkx84bgI8= =c5bK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --rqzD5py0kzyFAOWN--