From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from server1.serv-net.de (31.204.203.213.rev.inetbone.net [213.203.204.31]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A73E668654 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2005 00:55:52 +1000 (EST) From: Rupert Eibauer To: Kumar Gala Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 17:11:02 +0200 References: <200510211417.49651.rupert@ces.ch> <200510211442.08477.rupert@ces.ch> <30B37541-CAC4-4052-B33D-AE1373C16FD3@freescale.com> In-Reply-To: <30B37541-CAC4-4052-B33D-AE1373C16FD3@freescale.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Message-Id: <200510211711.02997.rupert@ces.ch> Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFT] please use this one List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Friday 21 October 2005 16:28, Kumar Gala wrote: > The concept of PPC_HIGH_BATS is already some what handled with > CPU_FTR_HAS_HIGH_BATS. I recommend you use this feature instead of > introducing another one as well as a compile time option. CPU_FTR_HAS_HIGH_BATS only clears the high bats, but does not attempt to use them. My patch will use them. Rupert > > - k >