From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from xyzzy.farnsworth.org (unknown [65.200.49.142]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D873F685A6 for ; Wed, 26 Oct 2005 04:30:05 +1000 (EST) From: "Dale Farnsworth" Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 11:30:04 -0700 To: Nicolas DET , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org Message-ID: <20051025183004.GB13982@xyzzy.farnsworth.org> References: <1130225496.3946.2.camel@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <1130225496.3946.2.camel@localhost.localdomain> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.14-rc5 1/1] : mv643xx_eth_showsram: Added information message when using the SRAM List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 07:31:35AM +0000, Nicolas DET wrote: > Added information message when using the SRAM in mv643xx_eth_probe() > > Signed-off-by: Nicolas DET > Signed-off-by: Sven Luther > > diff -Naur a/drivers/net/mv643xx_eth.c b/drivers/net/mv643xx_eth.c > --- a/drivers/net/mv643xx_eth.c 2005-10-25 09:24:57.952386000 +0200 > +++ b/drivers/net/mv643xx_eth.c 2005-10-25 09:25:02.220386000 +0200 > @@ -1533,6 +1533,9 @@ > printk(KERN_NOTICE "%s: RX NAPI Enabled \n", dev->name); > #endif > > + if (mp->tx_sram_size > 0) > + printk(KERN_NOTICE "%s: Using SRAM\n", dev->name); > + > return 0; > > out: Do you really think this is necessary? I think this driver is already too verbose and we should be remove messages, not add them. :) -Dale