From: David Jander <david.jander@protonic.nl>
To: linux-ppc-embedded <linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org>
Subject: Kernel 2.6 on MPC8xx performance trouble...
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 08:57:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200510280857.44625.david.jander@protonic.nl> (raw)
Hi all,
Many people have said it before: 2.6 has a performance penalty specially for
embdedded systems.
But now that I have 2.6 running on our 100MHz MPC852T based board, I was
shocked to see the result:
The most simple task doing nothing but a closed loop of integer math runs at
_half_ the speed compared to kernel 2.4.25!!!!!
Here are the conditions for the test:
- Bogomips are the same, so the CPU definitely runs at the same clock-rate
(and not half) as with "2.4".
- Enabling and disabling preemption doesn't have any impact (as expected for
such kinds of tasks).
- Setting HZ to 100 or 1000 also has only about 3% impact on speed.
- The binary of the test program is the same in both cases (no re-compile with
other optimizations by accident).
- The hardware is the same (exact same board).
- Certain hardware drivers that are not ported to "2.6" yet were present in
"2.4" but (obviously) not in "2.6", but non of them could have a _positive_
impact on performance.
- Kernel versions are 2.4.25 (denx-devel) and 2.6.14-rc5 (denx-git 20051027).
Result: The test takes 3 seconds on kernel-2.6 and 1.5 seconds on kernel-2.4.
Here is what "time" has to say about it:
real 0m3.119s
user 0m3.080s
sys 0m0.040s
The test loop is pretty brain-dead, but that doesn't matter right now.
This is it:
[....]
gettimeofday(&tv0,NULL);
for(t=0L; t<10000000L; t++)
{
a+=b; /* Do something */
}
gettimeofday(&tv,NULL);
[...]
Any ideas?
Am I misconfiguring something? Is 2.6 support for mpc8xx still broken
(cache/tlb, mm, etc) or is 2.6 supposed to perform THAT bad??
Greetings,
--
David Jander
next reply other threads:[~2005-10-28 6:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-10-28 6:57 David Jander [this message]
2005-10-28 9:36 ` Kernel 2.6 on MPC8xx performance trouble Roger Larsson
2005-10-28 10:57 ` David Jander
2005-10-28 18:44 ` Roger Larsson
2005-10-28 20:37 ` Wolfgang Denk
2005-10-31 9:31 ` David Jander
2005-10-28 15:30 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2005-10-31 8:21 ` David Jander
2005-10-31 12:58 ` Mark Chambers
2005-10-31 13:08 ` David Jander
2005-10-31 15:29 ` David Jander
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200510280857.44625.david.jander@protonic.nl \
--to=david.jander@protonic.nl \
--cc=linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).