From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 22:59:17 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Paul Mackerras Message-Id: <20051028225917.2873a74e.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <17251.3222.175214.996295@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> References: <17250.8725.358204.62510@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> <20051028103041.B15268@cox.net> <20051028130246.459f1e9a.akpm@osdl.org> <17250.49231.248045.41302@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> <20051028174029.24d4dbb9.akpm@osdl.org> <17251.3222.175214.996295@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, kumar.gala@freescale.com, linuxppc64-dev@ozlabs.org Subject: Re: Patches for 2.6.15 List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Paul Mackerras wrote: > > Andrew Morton writes: > > > I'll mail them all over. > > Got them, thanks. I'm going to drop 06, 12, 13, 18, 19, 20, 21, and > 37 for now. The rest I have committed to the powerpc-merge tree. > > The reasons for dropping them are: > > 06 - need to discuss the specifics of the patch with Marcelo > 12, 13 - going through netdev tree > 18 - it seems there is still ongoing discussion about whether this is > the best approach > 19, 20, 21 - BenH's SMU stuff, which he told me he would rebase on > top of the merge tree > 37 - I want the patch done a little differently OK, well I'll probably drop all those patches as well - hopefully all the originators know what's going on and nothing will fall through a crack.