From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from hera.kernel.org (hera.kernel.org [140.211.167.34]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF0B568660 for ; Wed, 2 Nov 2005 08:49:36 +1100 (EST) Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 14:33:12 -0200 From: Marcelo Tosatti To: Tom Rini Message-ID: <20051101163312.GB5095@logos.cnet> References: <20051026133648.GA10373@logos.cnet> <20051026220205.GH26475@smtp.west.cox.net> <20051028085224.GA17520@logos.cnet> <20051028161054.GB22245@smtp.west.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20051028161054.GB22245@smtp.west.cox.net> Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org Subject: Re: Makefile check for older binutils broken? List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , > > Yep, that does the trick. Is it good now? > > Er, that's odd. I was using writing parens, not shell parens :) Can > you test the failure case here by changing dssall to garbage? Also, > that's not a clean patch, but vs your last one that wasn't valid. Problem is specific to invocation of "make" inside a (particular) Makefile. Again, sorry for you wasting your time.