From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from protonic.prtnl (protonic.xs4all.nl [213.84.116.84]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7AD468703 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 19:18:13 +1100 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by protonic.prtnl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E11529EBC for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 09:16:35 +0100 (CET) Received: from protonic.prtnl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (protonic [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 31647-10 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 09:16:34 +0100 (CET) Received: from linux.local (linux.prtnl [192.168.1.97]) by protonic.prtnl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 630F029EBB for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 09:16:34 +0100 (CET) From: David Jander To: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 10:18:07 +0200 References: <200510302203.25390.pantelis.antoniou@gmail.com> <20051109120450.GB8588@logos.cnet> <200511100848.46263.david.jander@protonic.nl> In-Reply-To: <200511100848.46263.david.jander@protonic.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Message-Id: <200511100918.08060.david.jander@protonic.nl> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.14] mm: 8xx MM fix for List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thursday 10 November 2005 08:48, David Jander wrote: >[...] > Hmmm. This is a lot in the line of the tests I did with (the more generic > benchmark) nbench. After looking at those results (see my other post in > this thread) I already suspected something like this. Sorry, I obviously did not mean this thread, but the following post on another thread: http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-embedded/2005-November/020775.html Regards, -- David Jander