From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: From: Michael Ellerman To: Kumar Gala Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 10:47:54 +1100 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart27625073.DqQt07v5Gx"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Message-Id: <200511151047.57684.michael@ellerman.id.au> Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, linuxppc64@gate.crashing.org Subject: Re: asm-ppc/page.h vs asm-powerpc/page.h Reply-To: michael@ellerman.id.au List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , --nextPart27625073.DqQt07v5Gx Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline My original patch removed it, so Paulus must have kept if for some good=20 reason. asm-powerpc/page.h probably should have page_to_virt, I'm not sure why I to= ok=20 it out :? cheers On Tue, 15 Nov 2005 10:01, Kumar Gala wrote: > Guys, what's going on here. > > Why haven't we removed asm-ppc/page.h? > > When I build ARCH=3Dpowerpc I get asm-powerpc/page.h, which doesn't build= on > 85xx since page_to_virt is missing. > > Any reason we are keeping around asm-ppc/page.h and causing this > confusion? > > - kumar =2D-=20 Michael Ellerman IBM OzLabs email: michael:ellerman.id.au inmsg: mpe:jabber.org wwweb: http://michael.ellerman.id.au phone: +61 2 6212 1183 (tie line 70 21183) We do not inherit the earth from our ancestors, we borrow it from our children. - S.M.A.R.T Person --nextPart27625073.DqQt07v5Gx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD4DBQBDeSItdSjSd0sB4dIRAq9NAJ4kc2hk3jKYE5aonr2cdpWXgAnCPgCY1woL ipXnW/HcpI3TH0xWRijS4g== =R9Zv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart27625073.DqQt07v5Gx--