From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from fed1rmmtao01.cox.net (fed1rmmtao01.cox.net [68.230.241.38]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 212BB68802 for ; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 10:27:39 +1100 (EST) Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2005 16:27:38 -0700 From: Tom Rini To: Marcelo Tosatti Message-ID: <20051128232738.GE7766@smtp.west.cox.net> References: <20051117151730.GA10180@logos.cnet> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20051117151730.GA10180@logos.cnet> Cc: linux-ppc-embedded Subject: Re: INTERACTIVE_CONSOLE for misc-embedded.c and watchdog issue List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 01:17:30PM -0200, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > The following patch against misc-embedded.c adds an INTERACTIVE_CONSOLE > #define to guard reading from console (causes unecessary delay in some > situations). > > Its an adaptation of misc.c's define, a difference being that platform > headers define "NO_INTERACTIVE_CONSOLE" if required. > > What do you think? Please put a comment above the #ifndef stating where the define should be. But I have a feeling that's going to be somewhere under arch/ppc/platforms/ or include/asm-ppc/ and I don't know if that's a good idea... I've got a vauge idea on how we can handle this a little bit more cleanly, in the merge tree. -- Tom Rini http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/