From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-out.m-online.net (mail-out.m-online.net [212.18.0.9]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E75526884F for ; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 19:08:56 +1100 (EST) To: gil-ad@myrealbox.com From: Wolfgang Denk Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 29 Nov 2005 01:47:05 +0200." <200511290147.05220.gil-ad@myrealbox.com> Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 09:08:54 +0100 Sender: wd@denx.de Message-Id: <20051129080854.06789353F54@atlas.denx.de> Cc: linuxppc-embedded Subject: Re: Problem running kernel 2.6.14 (DENX) on MPC866 List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , In message <200511290147.05220.gil-ad@myrealbox.com> you wrote: > > I load linux from u-boot, and manage to go all the way until the call to cpu_idle() from rest_init(). > The system claims mounts a root file system over NFS. Sniffer logs and host logs support this claim. > If I do a while ( 1 ) printk( whatever ), just before cpu_idle(), the system continues to run. > If I let it call cpu_idle(), the system hangs. For 8xx you could / should use the kernel.org tree. We don't use 2.6 on 8xx yet. > U-Boot 1.1.3 (Nov 22 2005 - 00:26:43) > > CPU: unknown MPC86x (0x08010004) at 133 MHz: 16 kB I-Cache 8 kB D-Cache FEC present > *** Warning: CPU Core has Silicon Bugs -- Check the Errata *** You should fix this. > Monitor Command Prompt:>setenv gatewayip 10.0.0.138;setenv ethaddr 00:01:02:03:04:05; setenv console ttyCPM0,38400n8; setenv You use an illegal MAC address; please read the FAQ, especially http://www.denx.de/wiki/view/DULG/EthernetDoesNotWork and http://www.denx.de/wiki/view/DULG/WhereCanIGetAValidMACAddress Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- Software Engineering: Embedded and Realtime Systems, Embedded Linux Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd@denx.de How many seconds are there in a year? If I tell you there are 3.155 x 10^7, you won't even try to remember it. On the other hand, who could forget that, to within half a percent, pi seconds is a nanocentury. -- Tom Duff, Bell Labs