From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-out.m-online.net (mail-out.m-online.net [212.18.0.9]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE84D6888F for ; Wed, 7 Dec 2005 08:15:02 +1100 (EST) To: Matt Jerdonek From: Wolfgang Denk Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 06 Dec 2005 08:42:12 PST." <20051206164212.82779.qmail@web33505.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2005 22:14:59 +0100 Sender: wd@denx.de Message-Id: <20051206211459.E8976353F54@atlas.denx.de> Cc: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org Subject: Re: Denx vs kernel.org List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , In message <20051206164212.82779.qmail@web33505.mail.mud.yahoo.com> you wrote: > I'm looking at embedding linux into a PowerPC-based > system. I found the DENX website to be very helpful, > but I'm struggling to understand a few items: It would be helpful if you precisely stated which of the misc trees you are talking about. > 1) The source from kernel.org appears to have support > for the powerpc (arch/powerpc/8xx_io). But when using > 'make xconfig' I cannot select PowerPC from the list > of processors. Is this just a limitation on the the > configuration utility? Seems like you are trying to use the linux-2.6-denx tree and forgot to pass a "ARCH=ppc" argument to "make" (and did not set "ARCH=ppc" in your shell environment either). > 2) What is the difference between the sources on DENX > and kernel.org? Are there other places where PPC We have some stuff added which was submitted as patches to the list but not all of this has been accepted for or merged into the kernel.org tree yet. > linux kernel source is stored? I'm not opposed to > using the DENX source, I'm just trying to understand > it. You may want to read http://penguinppc.org/kernel/ > 3) I've used eCos before and I'm familiar with > RedBoot. Is there a compelling reason to use U-Boot > over RedBoot? For example, I think U-boot contains an > NFS client while RedBoot does not. Is this important? U-Boot contains a lot more. If these features are important to you depends on what you want to do. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- Software Engineering: Embedded and Realtime Systems, Embedded Linux Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd@denx.de The thing is, as you progress in the Craft, you'll learn there is another rule... When you break rules, break 'em good and hard. - Terry Pratchett, _Wyrd Sisters_