From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp-out.completel.net (smtp-out.completel.net [83.145.110.35]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2B7B688D5 for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 19:57:49 +1100 (EST) Received: from linuxdev.ECRIN-CROLLES (unknown [83.145.98.3]) by smtp-out.completel.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D79425C7AA for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 09:57:47 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 10:00:59 +0100 From: Nathael Pajani To: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org Message-Id: <20051219085747.5D79425C7AA@smtp-out.completel.net> Subject: [PATCH] powerpc: CPM2 interrupt handler failure after 100,000 List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , interrupts Message-Id: <20051219100059.5a95533f.nathael.pajani@cpe.fr> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.0.4 (GTK+ 2.8.9; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi! Hum.. in the patch you moved from "void" to "int": >-static void cpm2_cascade(int irq, void *dev_id, struct pt_regs *regs) >+static int cpm2_cascade(int irq, void *dev_id, struct pt_regs *regs) But should'nt it be "irqreturn_t" ? static irqreturn_t cpm2_cascade(int irq, void *dev_id, struct pt_regs *regs) +++ Have fun :) ----=20 Nathael PAJANI Ing=E9nieur CPE Lyon nathael.pajani@cpe.fr