linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alessandro Zummo <azummo-lists@towertech.it>
To: Simon Richter <Simon.Richter@hogyros.de>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org,
	lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk,
	nslu2-developers@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] RTC subsystem
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 16:07:12 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051221160712.2d322f42@inspiron> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43A94811.4010704@hogyros.de>

On Wed, 21 Dec 2005 13:18:25 +0100
Simon Richter <Simon.Richter@hogyros.de> wrote:

> >   I've posted a proposal for a new RTC subsystem
> >  on lkml ( http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/12/20/220 ) .
> 
> I agree that there is room for improvement. Do you have a specific 
> structure in mind? Specifically,

 Hi Simon,
  the proposal actually had a fully-working patch attached :)

>   - which functions do you believe to be generic,
>   - how should multiple RTCs be handled,

 In my code, the first rtc that register is bound
 to /proc/driver/rtc and /dev/rtc (if those interfaces
 are compiled in, as they are all selectable).

 The other RTCs are available thru /sys/class/rtc/rtcX
 (again, if compiled in).

>   - are read-only (radio controlled) RTCs taken care of?

 You have full control of which functions you will provide
 to the upper layer. Obivously if you try to set the
 time on a read-only rtc, you will get an error.

> At present, I don't have time to help the cause, but I can provide 
> hosting for a git tree if desired.

 Thanks, I'll consider it if the need arises.

-- 

 Best regards,

 Alessandro Zummo,
  Tower Technologies - Turin, Italy

  http://www.towertech.it

  reply	other threads:[~2005-12-21 15:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-12-20 21:00 [RFC] RTC subsystem Alessandro Zummo
2005-12-21 12:18 ` Simon Richter
2005-12-21 15:07   ` Alessandro Zummo [this message]
2005-12-21 16:02     ` Simon Richter
2005-12-21 17:41       ` Alessandro Zummo
2005-12-21 23:18         ` Simon Richter
2005-12-22  6:48           ` Alessandro Zummo
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-12-26 19:22 Alessandro Zummo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20051221160712.2d322f42@inspiron \
    --to=azummo-lists@towertech.it \
    --cc=Simon.Richter@hogyros.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org \
    --cc=nslu2-developers@yahoogroups.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).