From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from forward.hsphere.cc (forward-dummy9.hsphere.cc [216.157.144.9]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 30FD368952 for ; Thu, 22 Dec 2005 04:09:35 +1100 (EST) Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 From: To: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, inuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org, Jeff.Fellin@rflelect.com Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 12:02:48 -0500 Message-Id: <20051221170935.30FD368952@ozlabs.org> Subject: Re: Power Pc 405EP Reply-To: clark@esteem.com List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: ,
We have a device that uses the 405EP. If you are familiar with portin= g the 405GP then its not that much more difficult. Its just a matter of fin= ding a tree that has support for the 405EP (several don't). We had one prob= lem with the serial port baud rate at a particular speed but I can't remebe= r exactly what. I can't look right now as I'm exiled to WinDOS doing circui= t board work at the moment. We are using 2.4.27 with the NAPI patch and we = are quite pleased with it.


On Wed Dec 21 11:25 , = Jeff.Fellin@rflelect.com sent:


=0D We currently have a product implemented on a 405GP processor, and are
= =0D considering
=0D changing to a 405EP processor, since we need two Ethernet ports on the
=0D board. For
=0D various reasons we are using Linux-2.4-18 for our system base, with
= =0D busybox.
=0D
=0D If you know of any difficulty with doing a port of Linux, device drivers to=
=0D this platform
=0D I would appreciate your reply.
=0D
=0D Thank you
=0D Jeff Fellin
=0D RFL Electronics
=0D Jeff.Fellin@rflelect.com
=0D 973 334-3100, x 327
=0D
=0D _______________________________________________
=0D Linuxppc-dev mailing list
=0D = Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
=0D https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/lin= uxppc-dev
=0D
=0D
=