From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <olh@suse.de>
Received: from mx2.suse.de (mx2.suse.de [195.135.220.15])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(Client CN "mx2.suse.de",
	Issuer "Thawte Premium Server CA" (verified OK))
	by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A89F968A5A
	for <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>; Tue, 17 Jan 2006 03:30:40 +1100 (EST)
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 17:30:35 +0100
From: Olaf Hering <olh@suse.de>
To: Hollis Blanchard <hollis@penguinppc.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drop linuxppc64-dev
Message-ID: <20060116163035.GA13973@suse.de>
References: <20060116121244.GB7171@suse.de>
	<1137426731.22151.8.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
In-Reply-To: <1137426731.22151.8.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List <linuxppc-dev.ozlabs.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev>,
	<mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@ozlabs.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev>
List-Post: <mailto:linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>
List-Help: <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@ozlabs.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev>,
	<mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@ozlabs.org?subject=subscribe>

 On Mon, Jan 16, Hollis Blanchard wrote:

> Are you suggesting that nobody should ever use linuxppc64-dev now? If
> so, patching MAINTAINERS doesn't seem like the right way to enforce
> that.

It felt like a good starting point for this kind of discussion. :-)

-- 
short story of a lazy sysadmin:
 alias appserv=wotan