From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail15.bluewin.ch (mail15.bluewin.ch [195.186.18.63]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 726BB6893D for ; Wed, 18 Jan 2006 22:32:48 +1100 (EST) Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 06:09:05 -0500 To: Olaf Hering Subject: Re: [PATCH] drop linuxppc64-dev Message-ID: <20060118110905.GA23678@krypton> References: <20060116121244.GB7171@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20060116121244.GB7171@suse.de> From: apgo@patchbomb.org (Arthur Othieno) Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 01:12:44PM +0100, Olaf Hering wrote: > > Everything is merged into arch/powerpc now. > Stop cross-posting. > > Signed-off-by: Olaf Hering > > Documentation/powerpc/hvcs.txt | 2 +- > MAINTAINERS | 4 ++-- > 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) [snip] > Index: linux-2.6.15-olh/MAINTAINERS > =================================================================== > --- linux-2.6.15-olh.orig/MAINTAINERS > +++ linux-2.6.15-olh/MAINTAINERS > @@ -527,7 +527,7 @@ S: Supported > BROADBAND PROCESSOR ARCHITECTURE > P: Arnd Bergmann > M: arnd@arndb.de > -L: linuxppc64-dev@ozlabs.org > +L: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org > W: http://linuxppc64.org > S: Supported > > @@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ P: Anton Blanchard > M: anton@samba.org > M: anton@au.ibm.com > W: http://linuxppc64.org > -L: linuxppc64-dev@ozlabs.org > +L: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org > S: Supported > > LINUX SECURITY MODULE (LSM) FRAMEWORK What about the s/linuxppc64\.org/penguinppc\.org/g case? Or is penguinppc64.org preferable? Or am I just taking it too far? ;)