linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
To: laforge@netfilter.org
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mikpe@user.it.uu.se
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x_tables: fix alignment on [at least] ppc32
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 16:56:35 -0800 (PST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060119.165635.104653932.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060120004512.GT4603@sunbeam.de.gnumonks.org>

From: Harald Welte <laforge@netfilter.org>
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 01:45:12 +0100

> [NETFILTER] x_tables: Fix XT_ALIGN() macro on [at least] ppc32
> 
> To keep backwards compatibility with old iptables userspace programs,
> the new XT_ALIGN macro always has to return the same value as IPT_ALIGN,
> IP6T_ALIGN or ARPT_ALIGN in previous kernels.
> 
> However, in those kernels the macro was defined in dependency to the
> respective layer3 specifi data structures, which we can no longer do with
> x_tables.
> 
> The fix is an ugly kludge, but it has been tested to solve the problem. Yet
> another reason to move away from the current {ip,ip6,arp,eb}tables like
> data structures.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Harald Welte <laforge@netfilter.org>

Harald, I'm going to modify this to just use u_int64_t as that
should be totally sufficient.

It is the largest type, and will produce the desired results without
the silly structure.

Some malloc() implementations use "long double" to figure out the
largest type size and alignment requirements any C type might have
on the machine.  But there is no reason to use that here.

  reply	other threads:[~2006-01-20  1:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-01-18 14:09 2.6.16-rc1: iptables broken on ppc32? Mikael Pettersson
2006-01-18 15:01 ` Harald Welte
2006-01-20  0:45   ` [PATCH] x_tables: fix alignment on [at least] ppc32 (was Re: 2.6.16-rc1: iptables broken on ppc32?) Harald Welte
2006-01-20  0:56     ` David S. Miller [this message]
2006-01-20  9:28       ` [PATCH] x_tables: fix alignment on [at least] ppc32 Mikael Pettersson
2006-01-20  9:43         ` David S. Miller
2006-01-20 17:28       ` Harald Welte

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060119.165635.104653932.davem@davemloft.net \
    --to=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=laforge@netfilter.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mikpe@user.it.uu.se \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).