From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-out.m-online.net (mail-out.m-online.net [212.18.0.9]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C38C689AE for ; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 00:40:25 +1100 (EST) To: =?iso-8859-9?Q?Mustafa_=C7ay=FDr?= From: Wolfgang Denk Subject: Re: u-boot debugging Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 20 Jan 2006 08:51:04 +0200." <008501c61d8d$e35ff9f0$9e01120a@bilisim.local> Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 14:40:23 +0100 Sender: wd@denx.de Message-Id: <20060120134023.57E2F353A3F@atlas.denx.de> Cc: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , In message <008501c61d8d$e35ff9f0$9e01120a@bilisim.local> you wrote: > > Which tool must i use to debuggin u-boot codes. BDI2000 or windriver > visionclick, which one do you prefer? is step by step code tracing > possible? I know that the BDI2000 works fine, and some people have been successfully using the vision* tools, too (often after some struggeling). My personal tool of choice is the BDi2000. Use the tool you know best... And yes, single stepping is possible if your tool allows it. Note that this question is off topic on this list; you should post such questions on the U-Boot mailing list. But please ntoe that... > Content-Type: text/html; > charset˙so-8859-9" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > ...HTML code is strictly forbidden there! Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- Software Engineering: Embedded and Realtime Systems, Embedded Linux Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd@denx.de If programming was easy, they wouldn't need something as complicated as a human being to do it, now would they? - L. Wall & R. L. Schwartz, _Programming Perl_