linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eugene Surovegin <ebs@ebshome.net>
To: Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@sunsite.dk>
Cc: "Jenkins, Clive" <Clive.Jenkins@xerox.com>, linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: Yosemite/440EP why are readl()/ioread32() setup to readlittle-endian?
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 01:08:27 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060202090827.GA12810@gate.ebshome.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9305ca410602020009r4946d874qc52c2b27f715370f@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 09:09:17AM +0100, Peter Korsgaard wrote:
> On 2/2/06, Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
> > > What is the preferred way of accessing non-PCI devices then? Direct
> > > pointer access?
> >
> > No direct pointer access is bad. On PPC You can use
> > in_be{8,16,32}/out_be{8,16,32}
> 
> What about arch independent drivers? Are there any generic approach
> for this or do you have to stick to ugly #ifdefs to decide between
> in_be32/inl ?

I'm curious, could you give an example of such arch independent 
driver?

-- 
Eugene

  reply	other threads:[~2006-02-02  9:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-02-01 11:19 Yosemite/440EP why are readl()/ioread32() setup to readlittle-endian? Jenkins, Clive
2006-02-01 17:02 ` David Hawkins
2006-02-01 17:44   ` Matt Porter
2006-02-01 17:53     ` David Hawkins
2006-02-01 18:04     ` David Hawkins
2006-02-01 18:11       ` Eugene Surovegin
2006-02-01 18:20         ` David Hawkins
2006-02-01 18:23           ` Eugene Surovegin
2006-02-01 21:14     ` Peter Korsgaard
2006-02-02  0:54       ` Kumar Gala
2006-02-02  3:07         ` Matt Porter
2006-02-02  8:09         ` Peter Korsgaard
2006-02-02  9:08           ` Eugene Surovegin [this message]
2006-02-02 17:34             ` Dale Farnsworth
2006-02-02 14:21           ` Matt Porter
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-02-01 18:35 Jenkins, Clive
2006-02-01 20:35 ` David Hawkins
2006-02-02  9:35 Jenkins, Clive
2006-02-02  9:46 ` Eugene Surovegin
2006-02-02 14:37   ` Matt Porter
2006-02-02 17:45     ` Eugene Surovegin
2006-02-02 18:16       ` Matt Porter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060202090827.GA12810@gate.ebshome.net \
    --to=ebs@ebshome.net \
    --cc=Clive.Jenkins@xerox.com \
    --cc=jacmet@sunsite.dk \
    --cc=linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).