* Anyone back-ported fs_enet to 2.4? Possible?
@ 2006-03-06 15:17 antonio.dibacco
2006-03-06 16:29 ` Pantelis Antoniou
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: antonio.dibacco @ 2006-03-06 15:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linuxppc-embedded
Hi,
anyone back ported fs_enet to 2.4? Is it feasible in your high opinion?
Bye,
Antonio.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Anyone back-ported fs_enet to 2.4? Possible?
2006-03-06 15:17 Anyone back-ported fs_enet to 2.4? Possible? antonio.dibacco
@ 2006-03-06 16:29 ` Pantelis Antoniou
2006-03-06 18:12 ` Antonio Di Bacco
2006-03-06 18:28 ` Antonio Di Bacco
0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Pantelis Antoniou @ 2006-03-06 16:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linuxppc-embedded
On Monday 06 March 2006 17:17, antonio.dibacco wrote:
> Hi,
>
> anyone back ported fs_enet to 2.4? Is it feasible in your high opinion?
>
> Bye,
> Antonio.
>
The original patches of fec_8xx did.
Try to get a hold of them.
Pantelis
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Anyone back-ported fs_enet to 2.4? Possible?
2006-03-06 16:29 ` Pantelis Antoniou
@ 2006-03-06 18:12 ` Antonio Di Bacco
2006-03-06 18:22 ` Pantelis Antoniou
2006-03-06 18:28 ` Antonio Di Bacco
1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Antonio Di Bacco @ 2006-03-06 18:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linuxppc-embedded; +Cc: pantelis
On Monday 06 March 2006 17:29, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> On Monday 06 March 2006 17:17, antonio.dibacco wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > anyone back ported fs_enet to 2.4? Is it feasible in your high opinion?
> >
> > Bye,
> > Antonio.
>
> The original patches of fec_8xx did.
>
> Try to get a hold of them.
>
> Pantelis
I need this fs_enet to support both FECs on a MPC875, is fs_enet suitable? Do
you know if there is a different driver that can be used?
Bye,
Antonio.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Anyone back-ported fs_enet to 2.4? Possible?
2006-03-06 18:12 ` Antonio Di Bacco
@ 2006-03-06 18:22 ` Pantelis Antoniou
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Pantelis Antoniou @ 2006-03-06 18:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Antonio Di Bacco; +Cc: linuxppc-embedded
On Monday 06 March 2006 20:12, Antonio Di Bacco wrote:
> On Monday 06 March 2006 17:29, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> > On Monday 06 March 2006 17:17, antonio.dibacco wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > anyone back ported fs_enet to 2.4? Is it feasible in your high opinion?
> > >
> > > Bye,
> > > Antonio.
> >
> > The original patches of fec_8xx did.
> >
> > Try to get a hold of them.
> >
> > Pantelis
>
> I need this fs_enet to support both FECs on a MPC875, is fs_enet suitable? Do
> you know if there is a different driver that can be used?
>
> Bye,
> Antonio.
>
fs_enet is the improved version of fec_8xx.
Pantelis
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Anyone back-ported fs_enet to 2.4? Possible?
2006-03-06 16:29 ` Pantelis Antoniou
2006-03-06 18:12 ` Antonio Di Bacco
@ 2006-03-06 18:28 ` Antonio Di Bacco
2006-03-06 18:36 ` Vitaly Bordug
2006-03-06 18:45 ` Pantelis Antoniou
1 sibling, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Antonio Di Bacco @ 2006-03-06 18:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linuxppc-embedded; +Cc: pantelis
On Monday 06 March 2006 17:29, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> On Monday 06 March 2006 17:17, antonio.dibacco wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > anyone back ported fs_enet to 2.4? Is it feasible in your high opinion?
> >
> > Bye,
> > Antonio.
>
> The original patches of fec_8xx did.
>
> Try to get a hold of them.
>
> Pantelis
Hi,
I saw a fec_8xx folder under drivers/net/, is this driver used by fs_enet or
is it a standalone driver for the FECs?
Thank you,
Antonio.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Anyone back-ported fs_enet to 2.4? Possible?
2006-03-06 18:28 ` Antonio Di Bacco
@ 2006-03-06 18:36 ` Vitaly Bordug
2006-03-06 18:45 ` Pantelis Antoniou
1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Vitaly Bordug @ 2006-03-06 18:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Antonio Di Bacco; +Cc: linuxppc-embedded
On Mon, 6 Mar 2006 19:28:03 +0100
Antonio Di Bacco <antonio.dibacco@aruba.it> wrote:
> On Monday 06 March 2006 17:29, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> > On Monday 06 March 2006 17:17, antonio.dibacco wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > anyone back ported fs_enet to 2.4? Is it feasible in your high opinion?
> > >
> > > Bye,
> > > Antonio.
> >
> > The original patches of fec_8xx did.
> >
> > Try to get a hold of them.
> >
> > Pantelis
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I saw a fec_8xx folder under drivers/net/, is this driver used by fs_enet or
> is it a standalone driver for the FECs?
>
fs_enet is the replacement of the fec_8xx... Well iirc early versions of fs_enet were functional and support 2.4 - search them around the list
At least, those patches could make you a clue what needs to be done to keep 2.4 compatibility...
> Thank you,
> Antonio.
> _______________________________________________
> Linuxppc-embedded mailing list
> Linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org
> https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded
>
>
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Anyone back-ported fs_enet to 2.4? Possible?
2006-03-06 18:28 ` Antonio Di Bacco
2006-03-06 18:36 ` Vitaly Bordug
@ 2006-03-06 18:45 ` Pantelis Antoniou
1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Pantelis Antoniou @ 2006-03-06 18:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Antonio Di Bacco; +Cc: linuxppc-embedded
On Monday 06 March 2006 20:28, Antonio Di Bacco wrote:
> On Monday 06 March 2006 17:29, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> > On Monday 06 March 2006 17:17, antonio.dibacco wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > anyone back ported fs_enet to 2.4? Is it feasible in your high opinion?
> > >
> > > Bye,
> > > Antonio.
> >
> > The original patches of fec_8xx did.
> >
> > Try to get a hold of them.
> >
> > Pantelis
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I saw a fec_8xx folder under drivers/net/, is this driver used by fs_enet or
> is it a standalone driver for the FECs?
>
> Thank you,
> Antonio.
>
it is a standalone driver.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-03-06 18:43 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-03-06 15:17 Anyone back-ported fs_enet to 2.4? Possible? antonio.dibacco
2006-03-06 16:29 ` Pantelis Antoniou
2006-03-06 18:12 ` Antonio Di Bacco
2006-03-06 18:22 ` Pantelis Antoniou
2006-03-06 18:28 ` Antonio Di Bacco
2006-03-06 18:36 ` Vitaly Bordug
2006-03-06 18:45 ` Pantelis Antoniou
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).