From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp101.biz.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp101.biz.mail.re2.yahoo.com [68.142.229.215]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 11D3167A6C for ; Tue, 7 Mar 2006 05:43:18 +1100 (EST) From: Pantelis Antoniou To: Antonio Di Bacco Subject: Re: Anyone back-ported fs_enet to 2.4? Possible? Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2006 20:45:13 +0200 References: <20060306151715.11926.qmail@mx1.aruba.it> <200603061829.30754.pantelis@embeddedalley.com> <200603061928.03561.antonio.dibacco@aruba.it> In-Reply-To: <200603061928.03561.antonio.dibacco@aruba.it> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Message-Id: <200603062045.13779.pantelis@embeddedalley.com> Cc: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Monday 06 March 2006 20:28, Antonio Di Bacco wrote: > On Monday 06 March 2006 17:29, Pantelis Antoniou wrote: > > On Monday 06 March 2006 17:17, antonio.dibacco wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > anyone back ported fs_enet to 2.4? Is it feasible in your high opinion? > > > > > > Bye, > > > Antonio. > > > > The original patches of fec_8xx did. > > > > Try to get a hold of them. > > > > Pantelis > > > Hi, > > I saw a fec_8xx folder under drivers/net/, is this driver used by fs_enet or > is it a standalone driver for the FECs? > > Thank you, > Antonio. > it is a standalone driver.