From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from buildserver.ru.mvista.com (unknown [85.21.88.6]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E96767B22 for ; Tue, 7 Mar 2006 05:37:02 +1100 (EST) Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2006 21:36:58 +0300 From: Vitaly Bordug To: Antonio Di Bacco Subject: Re: Anyone back-ported fs_enet to 2.4? Possible? Message-ID: <20060306213658.09ec5e6d@vitb.ru.mvista.com> In-Reply-To: <200603061928.03561.antonio.dibacco@aruba.it> References: <20060306151715.11926.qmail@mx1.aruba.it> <200603061829.30754.pantelis@embeddedalley.com> <200603061928.03561.antonio.dibacco@aruba.it> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, 6 Mar 2006 19:28:03 +0100 Antonio Di Bacco wrote: > On Monday 06 March 2006 17:29, Pantelis Antoniou wrote: > > On Monday 06 March 2006 17:17, antonio.dibacco wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > anyone back ported fs_enet to 2.4? Is it feasible in your high opinion? > > > > > > Bye, > > > Antonio. > > > > The original patches of fec_8xx did. > > > > Try to get a hold of them. > > > > Pantelis > > > Hi, > > I saw a fec_8xx folder under drivers/net/, is this driver used by fs_enet or > is it a standalone driver for the FECs? > fs_enet is the replacement of the fec_8xx... Well iirc early versions of fs_enet were functional and support 2.4 - search them around the list At least, those patches could make you a clue what needs to be done to keep 2.4 compatibility... > Thank you, > Antonio. > _______________________________________________ > Linuxppc-embedded mailing list > Linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org > https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded > > -- Sincerely, Vitaly