From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from buildserver.ru.mvista.com (unknown [85.21.88.6]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C963E67A5C for ; Tue, 28 Mar 2006 00:55:04 +1100 (EST) Received: from vitb.ru.mvista.com ([10.150.0.9]) by buildserver.ru.mvista.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id k2RDt2s08498 for ; Mon, 27 Mar 2006 18:55:02 +0500 Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2006 17:55:04 +0400 From: Vitaly Bordug To: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org Subject: Re: freescale 8xx: which architecture to use ? ppc - powerpc ? Message-ID: <20060327175504.40536812@vitb.ru.mvista.com> In-Reply-To: <4427E693.6060601@cs.fau.de> References: <4427E693.6060601@cs.fau.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, 27 Mar 2006 15:20:19 +0200 Josef Angermeier wrote: > > Hello, > > i want to run linux (2.6.15) on my MPC875 board. I wonder which > architecture to choose: "powerpc" or "ppc" ? - menuconfig shows a > "freescale 8xx" option when used with "powerpc", and a "8xx" option when > used with ARCH=ppc. Because i use a embedded freescale 8xx i wanted to > use the "powerpc" architecture. BUT: i seems to be unstable, i got some > undefined referencies. Or am i wrong ? You should use ppc for now. Work to move the 8xx stuff to the powerpc is ongoing, but quite far from complete state as you see... > > thanks > Josef > _______________________________________________ > Linuxppc-embedded mailing list > Linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org > https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded > > -- Sincerely, Vitaly