linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Carlos Mitidieri <carlos.mitidieri@sysgo.com>
To: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: pci-x
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 16:51:52 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200603281651.53196.carlos.mitidieri@sysgo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200603241607.35267.carlos.mitidieri@sysgo.com>


> On Friday 24 March 2006 15:53, Kumar Gala wrote:
> > That seems like a driver problem.  Does lspci show your devices after
> > you boot?  Also, what kernel ver are you using?
>
> No, the device behind the bridge is not recognized, although the bridge
> itself is. I am using kernel 2.6.15.

I am trying to use a PCI-X bridge (Intel 31154) on a mpc8540ads running kernel 
2.6.15.  A USB controller is behind the bridge. 

When the mpc8540ads is booted with the PCI-X switch disabled, the device 
behind the bridge is detected (and actually works), and the following 
messages are printed:

PCI: bridge rsrc 0..ffffff (100), parent c01ce78c
PCI: bridge rsrc 80000000..9fffffff (200), parent c01ce770
PCI: bridge rsrc fff000..ffffff (101), parent c0217038
PCI: bridge rsrc 9ff00000..9fffffff (200), parent c0217054
PCI: bridge rsrc 9fe00000..9fefffff (1201), parent c0217054
PCI:0000:01:06.0: Resource 0: 9ffff000-9fffffff (f=200)
PCI:0000:01:06.0: Resource 1: 9ffe0000-9ffeffff (f=1208)
PCI:0000:01:06.0: Resource 2: 9ffd0000-9ffdffff (f=200)
 
The last three lines are for the usb controller.
On the other hand, if the PCI-X is enabled, the usb controller is not detected 
anymore and the messages become:

PCI: bridge rsrc 0..ffffff (100), parent c01ce78c
PCI: bridge rsrc 80000000..9fffffff (200), parent c01ce770
PCI: bridge rsrc 0..fff (101), parent c0217038
PCI: bridge rsrc 0..fffff (200), parent c0217054
PCI: Cannot allocate resource region 1 of PCI bridge 1
PCI: bridge 1 resource 1 moved to 9ff00000..9fffffff
PCI: bridge rsrc 0..fffff (1201), parent c0217054
PCI: Cannot allocate resource region 2 of PCI bridge 1
PCI: bridge 1 resource 2 moved to 9fe00000..9fefffff

In the 3rd and 4th lines, the resource addresses are different for the two 
runs.  What could be the reason?

-- 
Carlos Mitidieri
SYSGO AG - Office Ulm

  reply	other threads:[~2006-03-28 14:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-03-23 13:35 pci-x Carlos Mitidieri
2006-03-23 15:41 ` pci-x Kumar Gala
2006-03-24 11:21   ` pci-x Carlos Mitidieri
2006-03-24 14:53     ` pci-x Kumar Gala
2006-03-24 15:07       ` pci-x Carlos Mitidieri
2006-03-28 14:51         ` Carlos Mitidieri [this message]
2006-03-30 16:28           ` pci-x Andy Fleming
2006-03-31  6:52             ` pci-x Carlos Mitidieri
2006-03-31 11:50               ` pci-x Vitaly Bordug

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200603281651.53196.carlos.mitidieri@sysgo.com \
    --to=carlos.mitidieri@sysgo.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).