From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from e36.co.us.ibm.com (e36.co.us.ibm.com [32.97.110.154]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "e36.co.us.ibm.com", Issuer "Equifax" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 051C6679F8 for ; Tue, 11 Apr 2006 01:46:48 +1000 (EST) Received: from westrelay02.boulder.ibm.com (westrelay02.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.11]) by e36.co.us.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k3AFkkdm014641 for ; Mon, 10 Apr 2006 11:46:46 -0400 Received: from d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (d03av01.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.167]) by westrelay02.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.10/NCO/VER6.8) with ESMTP id k3AFhIne250232 for ; Mon, 10 Apr 2006 09:43:18 -0600 Received: from d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k3AFkjm2025878 for ; Mon, 10 Apr 2006 09:46:45 -0600 Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2006 10:39:29 -0500 From: Jake Moilanen To: paulus@samba.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Base pSeries PCIe support Message-Id: <20060410103929.9664238d.moilanen@austin.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <20060401165723.ab77c81f.moilanen@austin.ibm.com> References: <20060331160203.f2bf8b53.moilanen@austin.ibm.com> <20060331161330.3c723103.moilanen@austin.ibm.com> <17454.15223.929530.985654@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> <20060401165723.ab77c81f.moilanen@austin.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Sat, 1 Apr 2006 16:57:23 -0600 Jake Moilanen wrote: > On Sat, 1 Apr 2006 19:36:07 +1100 > Paul Mackerras wrote: > > > Jake Moilanen writes: > > > > > The NR_IRQS got bumped up to 1024, as vectors can go much higher. > > > Unfortunately, this number was arbitrarily picked as there is no claim > > > at what the max number really is by either the firmware team, or the > > > PAPR+. > > > > What matters is the number of different vectors, not the actual value > > of the vectors, because we remap interrupt numbers that the firmware > > gives us to logical Linux irq numbers between 0 and NR_IRQS-1. We had > > to do that when the POWER5 systems came out, because the interrupt > > numbers there occupy 24 bits. > > Ah. That sounds right. I haven't had a chance to test this version of > the patch. Firmware is currently broken on my machine. I was able to validate that these patches do work, and we are receiving MSI interrupts correctly. Is it too late to get into 2.6.17? Jake