From: "Bob Picco" <bob.picco@hp.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mel@skynet.ie>
Cc: davej@codemonkey.org.uk, "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>,
ak@suse.de, Bob Picco <bob.picco@hp.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] [RFC] Sizing zones and holes in an architecture independent manner
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2006 21:38:24 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060412013824.GF23742@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0604120053080.10268@skynet.skynet.ie>
Mel Gorman wrote: [Tue Apr 11 2006, 08:02:10PM EDT]
> On Tue, 11 Apr 2006, Bob Picco wrote:
>
> >luck wrote: [Tue Apr 11 2006, 06:20:29PM EDT]
> >>On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 11:39:46AM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> >>
> >>>The patches have only been *compile tested* for ia64 with a flatmem
> >>>configuration. At attempt was made to boot test on an ancient RS/6000
> >>>but the vanilla kernel does not boot so I have to investigate there.
> >>
> >>The good news: Compilation is clean on the ia64 config variants that
> >>I usually build (all 10 of them).
> >>
> >>The bad (or at least consistent) news: It doesn't boot on an Intel
> >>Tiger either (oops at kmem_cache_alloc+0x41).
> >>
> >>-Tony
> >I had a reply queued to report the same failure with
> >DISCONTIG+NUMA+VIRTUAL_MEM_MAP. This was 2 CPU HP rx2600. I'll take a
> >closer
> >look at the code tomorrow.
> >
>
> hmm, ok, so discontig.c is in use which narrows things down. When
> build_node_maps() is called, I assumed that the start and end pfn passed
> in was for a valid page range. Was this a valid assumption? When I re-read
The addresses are a valid physical range. The caution should be that
filter_rsvd_memory converts the addresses from identity mapped to
physical. efi_memmap_walk calls back to function with identity mapped
addresses. What you've done seems okay.
BTW - I like want you are attempting to achieve.
> the comment, it implies that memory holes could be within this range which
> would cause boot failures. If that is the case, the correct thing to do
> was to call add_active_range() in count_node_pages() instead of
> build_node_maps().
Yes that helps because of granules and it boots. The patch below is applied
on top of your original post. But..
Index: linux-2.6.17-rc1/arch/ia64/mm/discontig.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.17-rc1.orig/arch/ia64/mm/discontig.c 2006-04-11 20:36:15.000000000 -0400
+++ linux-2.6.17-rc1/arch/ia64/mm/discontig.c 2006-04-11 20:52:59.000000000 -0400
@@ -88,9 +88,6 @@ static int __init build_node_maps(unsign
min_low_pfn = min(min_low_pfn, bdp->node_boot_start>>PAGE_SHIFT);
max_low_pfn = max(max_low_pfn, bdp->node_low_pfn);
- /* Add a known active range */
- add_active_range(node, start, end);
-
return 0;
}
@@ -651,6 +648,8 @@ static __init int count_node_pages(unsig
mem_data[node].min_pfn = min(mem_data[node].min_pfn,
start >> PAGE_SHIFT);
+ add_active_range(node, start, end);
+
return 0;
}
Page free/avail accounting is off and I'm done for tonight. I believe it's how
you treat holes but haven't looked closely yet.
Let me wrap my head around this code again. It's been some time.
>
bob
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-04-12 1:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-04-11 10:39 [PATCH 0/6] [RFC] Sizing zones and holes in an architecture independent manner Mel Gorman
2006-04-11 10:40 ` [PATCH 1/6] Introduce mechanism for registering active regions of memory Mel Gorman
2006-04-11 10:40 ` [PATCH 2/6] Have Power use add_active_range() and free_area_init_nodes() Mel Gorman
2006-04-11 10:40 ` [PATCH 3/6] Have x86 use add_active_range() and free_area_init_nodes Mel Gorman
2006-04-11 10:41 ` [PATCH 4/6] Have x86_64 " Mel Gorman
2006-04-11 10:41 ` [PATCH 5/6] Have ia64 " Mel Gorman
2006-04-11 10:41 ` [PATCH 6/6] Break out memory initialisation code from page_alloc.c to mem_init.c Mel Gorman
2006-04-11 11:07 ` Nick Piggin
2006-04-11 16:59 ` Mel Gorman
2006-04-11 22:20 ` [PATCH 0/6] [RFC] Sizing zones and holes in an architecture independent manner Luck, Tony
2006-04-11 23:23 ` Mel Gorman
2006-04-12 0:05 ` Luck, Tony
2006-04-12 10:50 ` Mel Gorman
2006-04-12 15:46 ` Luck, Tony
2006-04-12 16:00 ` Mel Gorman
2006-04-12 16:36 ` Luck, Tony
2006-04-12 17:50 ` Mel Gorman
2006-04-12 17:07 ` Luck, Tony
2006-04-12 17:18 ` Bob Picco
2006-04-12 17:32 ` Mel Gorman
2006-04-12 15:54 ` Luck, Tony
2006-04-11 23:29 ` Bob Picco
2006-04-12 0:02 ` Mel Gorman
2006-04-12 1:38 ` Bob Picco [this message]
2006-04-12 10:59 ` Mel Gorman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060412013824.GF23742@localhost \
--to=bob.picco@hp.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=davej@codemonkey.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=mel@skynet.ie \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).