From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <wd@denx.de>
Received: from mail-out.m-online.net (mail-out.m-online.net [212.18.0.9])
	by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FDF367A5D
	for <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>; Wed, 26 Apr 2006 07:24:42 +1000 (EST)
To: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
From: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
Subject: Re: 85xx FDT updates? 
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 25 Apr 2006 13:31:21 CDT."
	<E29663C3-8289-443F-BF7A-F973EC41CC72@kernel.crashing.org>
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 23:24:40 +0200
Sender: wd@denx.de
Message-Id: <20060425212440.65DF0352B18@atlas.denx.de>
Cc: "linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>
List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List <linuxppc-dev.ozlabs.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev>,
	<mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@ozlabs.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev>
List-Post: <mailto:linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>
List-Help: <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@ozlabs.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev>,
	<mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@ozlabs.org?subject=subscribe>

In message <E29663C3-8289-443F-BF7A-F973EC41CC72@kernel.crashing.org> you wrote:
> 
> I'm not talking about all embedded PPC boards.  I'm taking about the  
> subset that exists for 85xx.  Also, its moving forward as the  

What's the difference?

> And how do you suggest we do this?  My argument is for the boards I'm  
> talking about updating u-boot is the easiest and most straight  
> forward solution.  I'm not advocating this at the right solution for  

It may be easiest for you, not for others. 

Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

-- 
Software Engineering:  Embedded and Realtime Systems,  Embedded Linux
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd@denx.de
As far as we know, our computer has never had an undetected error.
		                                           -- Weisert