From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from protonic.prtnl (protonic.xs4all.nl [213.84.116.84]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4757B679F7 for ; Wed, 26 Apr 2006 21:47:37 +1000 (EST) From: David Jander To: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org, chandrasekhar_n@math.net Subject: Re: Linux 2.6 sources for MPC852T processor Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 13:50:04 +0200 References: <20060426025008.C8A7D773@resin02.mta.everyone.net> In-Reply-To: <20060426025008.C8A7D773@resin02.mta.everyone.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Message-Id: <200604261350.05295.david.jander@protonic.nl> List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wednesday 26 April 2006 11:50, Chandrasekhar Nagaraj wrote: >
Hi,
>
I have a customized board based on the MPC852T based processor.
>
I intend to develop a BSP for this board.
>
 
>
Does 2.6.16 from the kernel.org support this processor?
First of all, please avoid HTML in e-mail messages. It is hard to read, and normally banned on mailing list such as this one. Yes, MPC852T is supported, although I might add that I have been using 2.6.14 and 2.6.15 sucessfully with our own MPC852T-based board, but 2.6.16 did not boot and as of today I don't know why, or whether this is an issue at all with boards other than ours. >
 
>
In the 2.6.16 sources I found support for CONFIG_8xx. Does this mean > that 852T processor is also supported?
 
Yes. Look at BSP stuff for other 8xx boards to learn how to port yours. Keep an eye on the new platform_bus stuff, that's currently being implemented for different drivers and subsystmes for powerpc (this could be the reason, our own BSP stuff stopped working with 2.6.16, btw). Also a transition from /arch/ppc and /arch/ppc64 towards the common /arch/powerpc is in progress, and therefore some things might be in a state of flux between released versions of the kernel. As of today (kernel 2.6.16) the architecture you need to use is still /arch/ppc. Good luck! Greetings, -- David Jander