From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from protonic.prtnl (protonic.xs4all.nl [213.84.116.84]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E90A67A07 for ; Fri, 5 May 2006 01:43:40 +1000 (EST) From: David Jander To: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org Subject: Re: frequent sig 11 with malloc() on mpc8xx Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 17:46:31 +0200 References: <20060504144605.B18B3353BE7@atlas.denx.de> In-Reply-To: <20060504144605.B18B3353BE7@atlas.denx.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Message-Id: <200605041746.31645.david.jander@protonic.nl> List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thursday 04 May 2006 16:46, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Ummm... I have yet to see a single case where moving to 2.6 improved > the stability for a MPC8xx system :-( Our case. Jffs2's gc thread stopped crashing. This might have more to do with mtd/jffs2 than with the rest of the kernel, but it sure works better now. Nevertheless I am very interested in hearing about (potential) stability problems with with 2.6.14, 15 and 16 (besides not booting just because Marcelo couldn't resist screwing up on the last minute; problem which is being worked on ;-). Greetings, -- David Jander