From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.ebshome.net (gate.ebshome.net [64.81.67.12]) (using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits)) (Client CN "gate.ebshome.net", Issuer "gate.ebshome.net" (not verified)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E3E6679E7 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 03:15:27 +1000 (EST) Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 10:15:20 -0700 From: Eugene Surovegin To: Alex Zeffertt Subject: Re: Viable PPC platform? Message-ID: <20060509171520.GA10886@gate.ebshome.net> References: <20060509174101.389c67c0.ajz@cambridgebroadband.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20060509174101.389c67c0.ajz@cambridgebroadband.com> Cc: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org, geneSmith List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 05:41:01PM +0100, Alex Zeffertt wrote: > On Tue, 09 May 2006 10:38:19 -0400 > geneSmith wrote: > > > I have a ppc405gpr system with 64M ram and 4Meg flash in a > > AM29LV320. Is this a viable platform for linux? Can a filesystem > > (JFFS2?) be put this flash type? > > > > I would create an initrd and put every file that doesn't need > to be changed persistently into it instead of JFFS2. After many years of doing embedded Linux stuff I still don't understand why people are so fond of initrd. For temporary stuff - tempfs is much better and flexible. For r/o stuff - just make separate MTD partition (cramfs, squashfs) and mount it directly as root. Both options will waste significantly less memory. -- Eugene