linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: davej@codemonkey.org.uk, tony.luck@intel.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	mel@csn.ul.ie, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bob.picco@hp.com,
	linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] Have x86_64 use add_active_range() and free_area_init_nodes
Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 00:17:59 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200605210017.59984.ak@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060520144043.22f993b1.akpm@osdl.org>

 
> Well, it creates arch-neutral common code, teaches various architectures
> use it.  It's the sort of thing we do all the time.
> 
> These things are opportunities to eliminate crufty arch code which few
> people understand and replace them with new, clean common code which lots
> of people understand.  That's not a bad thing to be doing.

I'm not fundamentally against that, but so far it seems to just generate lots of 
new bugs?  I'm not sure it's really worth the pain.

-Andi

  reply	other threads:[~2006-05-20 22:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-05-08 14:10 [PATCH 0/6] Sizing zones and holes in an architecture independent manner V6 Mel Gorman
2006-05-08 14:10 ` [PATCH 1/6] Introduce mechanism for registering active regions of memory Mel Gorman
2006-05-08 14:11 ` [PATCH 2/6] Have Power use add_active_range() and free_area_init_nodes() Mel Gorman
2006-05-08 14:11 ` [PATCH 3/6] Have x86 use add_active_range() and free_area_init_nodes Mel Gorman
2006-05-08 14:11 ` [PATCH 4/6] Have x86_64 " Mel Gorman
2006-05-20 20:59   ` Andrew Morton
2006-05-20 21:27     ` Andi Kleen
2006-05-20 21:40       ` Andrew Morton
2006-05-20 22:17         ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2006-05-20 22:54           ` Andrew Morton
2006-05-21 16:20       ` Mel Gorman
2006-05-21 15:50     ` Mel Gorman
2006-05-21 19:08       ` Andrew Morton
2006-05-21 22:23         ` Mel Gorman
2006-05-23 18:01     ` Mel Gorman
2006-05-08 14:12 ` [PATCH 5/6] Have ia64 " Mel Gorman
2006-05-15  3:31   ` Andrew Morton
2006-05-15  8:21     ` Andy Whitcroft
2006-05-15 10:00       ` Nick Piggin
2006-05-15 10:19         ` Andy Whitcroft
2006-05-15 10:29           ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2006-05-15 10:47             ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2006-05-15 11:02             ` Andy Whitcroft
2006-05-16  0:31             ` Nick Piggin
2006-05-16  1:34               ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2006-05-16  2:11                 ` Nick Piggin
2006-05-15 12:27     ` Mel Gorman
2006-05-15 22:44       ` Mel Gorman
2006-05-19 14:03     ` Mel Gorman
2006-05-19 14:23       ` Andy Whitcroft
2006-05-08 14:12 ` [PATCH 6/6] Break out memory initialisation code from page_alloc.c to mem_init.c Mel Gorman
2006-05-09  1:47   ` Nick Piggin
2006-05-09  8:24     ` Mel Gorman
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-08-21 13:45 [PATCH 0/6] Sizing zones and holes in an architecture independent manner V9 Mel Gorman
2006-08-21 13:46 ` [PATCH 4/6] Have x86_64 use add_active_range() and free_area_init_nodes Mel Gorman
2006-08-30 20:57   ` Keith Mannthey
2006-08-31 15:49     ` Mel Gorman
2006-08-31 17:52       ` Keith Mannthey
2006-08-31 18:40         ` Mel Gorman
2006-09-01  3:08           ` Keith Mannthey
2006-09-01  8:33             ` Mel Gorman
2006-09-01  8:46               ` Mika Penttilä
2006-09-04 15:36             ` Mel Gorman
2006-07-08 11:10 [PATCH 0/6] Sizing zones and holes in an architecture independent manner V8 Mel Gorman
2006-07-08 11:12 ` [PATCH 4/6] Have x86_64 use add_active_range() and free_area_init_nodes Mel Gorman
2006-04-11 10:39 [PATCH 0/6] [RFC] Sizing zones and holes in an architecture independent manner Mel Gorman
2006-04-11 10:41 ` [PATCH 4/6] Have x86_64 use add_active_range() and free_area_init_nodes Mel Gorman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200605210017.59984.ak@suse.de \
    --to=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=bob.picco@hp.com \
    --cc=davej@codemonkey.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).