From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: mel@csn.ul.ie (Mel Gorman)
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Compile failure fix for ppc on 2.6.17-rc4-mm3 (2nd attempt)
Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 09:49:24 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060526094924.10efc515.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060526151214.GA5190@skynet.ie>
mel@csn.ul.ie (Mel Gorman) wrote:
>
> (Resending with Andrew's email address correct this time)
>
> For the last few -mm releases, kernels built for an old RS6000 failed to
> compile with the message;
>
> arch/powerpc/kernel/built-in.o(.init.text+0x77b4): In function `vrsqrtefp':
> : undefined reference to `__udivdi3'
> arch/powerpc/kernel/built-in.o(.init.text+0x7800): In function `vrsqrtefp':
> : undefined reference to `__udivdi3'
> make: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1
A function with a name like that doesn't _deserve_ to compile.
But actually vrsqrtefp() doesn't call __udivdi3 - the error lies somewhere
else in the kernel and the toolchain gets it wrong, so we don't know where.
The way I usually hunt this problem down is to build the .s files (make
arch/powerpc/kernel/foo.s) and then grep around, find the offending C
function.
If the problem is specific to powerpc then a
diffstat 2.6.17.rc4-mm3 | grep powerpc
will narrow down the number of files to be searched by rather a lot.
> 2.6.17-rc5 is not affected but I didn't search for the culprit patch in
> -mm. The following patch adds an implementation of __udivdi3 for plain old
> ppc32. This may not be the correct fix as Google tells me that __udivdi3
> has been replaced by calls to do_div() in a number of cases. There was no
> obvious way to do that for vrsqrtefp, hence this workaround. The patch should
> be acked, rejected or replaced by a ppc expert.
Yes, we've traditionally avoided adding the 64-bit divide library functions.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-05-26 16:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-05-26 15:12 [PATCH] Compile failure fix for ppc on 2.6.17-rc4-mm3 (2nd attempt) Mel Gorman
2006-05-26 16:49 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2006-05-29 15:49 ` Mel Gorman
2006-05-29 16:22 ` Segher Boessenkool
2006-05-29 17:38 ` Mel Gorman
2006-05-29 17:56 ` Segher Boessenkool
2006-05-29 19:05 ` Mel Gorman
2006-06-09 9:36 ` Paul Mackerras
2006-06-13 16:49 ` Mel Gorman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060526094924.10efc515.akpm@osdl.org \
--to=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).