From: Vitaly Bordug <vbordug@ru.mvista.com>
To: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
Cc: p_gortmaker@yahoo.com, linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] Updates for WRS SBC82xx boards
Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 12:22:48 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060526122248.14c6728c@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060525182533.GD679@windriver.com>
On Thu, 25 May 2006 14:25:33 -0400
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> wrote:
>
> patch2: sbc82xx-PCI-diff1
> - allow m82xx_pci.c to be used by other platforms that have
> their own map_irq
>
> I'm open to doing this another way if desired -- I just went for the
> minimal impact on the existing code with this.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
>
>
> diff -ur orig/linux-2.6.16rc2/arch/ppc/platforms/sbc82xx.c
> linux-2.6.16rc2/arch/ppc/platforms/sbc82xx.c ---
> orig/linux-2.6.16rc2/arch/ppc/platforms/sbc82xx.c 2006-02-09
> 16:20:35.000000000 -0500 +++
> linux-2.6.16rc2/arch/ppc/platforms/sbc82xx.c 2006-02-09
> 16:01:40.000000000 -0500 @@ -198,7 +198,7 @@ } }
>
> -static int sbc82xx_pci_map_irq(struct pci_dev *dev, unsigned char
> idsel, +int pq2pci_map_irq(struct pci_dev *dev, unsigned char idsel,
> unsigned char pin)
> {
> static char pci_irq_table[][4] = {
> @@ -247,7 +247,7 @@
> callback_init_IRQ = ppc_md.init_IRQ;
>
> ppc_md.init_IRQ = sbc82xx_init_IRQ;
> - ppc_md.pci_map_irq = sbc82xx_pci_map_irq;
> + ppc_md.pci_map_irq = pq2pci_map_irq;
> #ifdef CONFIG_GEN_RTC
> ppc_md.time_init = NULL;
> ppc_md.get_rtc_time = NULL;
> diff -ur orig/linux-2.6.16rc2/arch/ppc/platforms/sbc82xx.h
> linux-2.6.16rc2/arch/ppc/platforms/sbc82xx.h ---
> orig/linux-2.6.16rc2/arch/ppc/platforms/sbc82xx.h 2006-02-09
> 16:20:35.000000000 -0500 +++
> linux-2.6.16rc2/arch/ppc/platforms/sbc82xx.h 2006-02-09
> 16:35:05.000000000 -0500 @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ #define
> BOOTROM_RESTART_ADDR ((uint)0x40000104)
> +#define HAVE_OWN_PQ2PCI_IRQ
> #define SBC82xx_PC_IRQA (NR_CPM_INTS+0)
> #define SBC82xx_PC_IRQB (NR_CPM_INTS+1)
> #define SBC82xx_MPC185_IRQ (NR_CPM_INTS+2)
> diff -ur orig/linux-2.6.16rc2/arch/ppc/syslib/m82xx_pci.c
> linux-2.6.16rc2/arch/ppc/syslib/m82xx_pci.c ---
> orig/linux-2.6.16rc2/arch/ppc/syslib/m82xx_pci.c 2006-01-02
> 22:21:10.000000000 -0500 +++
> linux-2.6.16rc2/arch/ppc/syslib/m82xx_pci.c 2006-02-09
> 14:35:10.000000000 -0500 @@ -51,6 +51,10 @@
> * Interrupt routing
> */
>
> +#ifdef HAVE_OWN_PQ2PCI_IRQ
> +extern int
> +pq2pci_map_irq(struct pci_dev *dev, unsigned char idsel, unsigned
> char pin); +#else
> static inline int
> pq2pci_map_irq(struct pci_dev *dev, unsigned char idsel, unsigned
> char pin) {
> @@ -172,6 +176,7 @@
> setup_irq(PCI_INT_TO_SIU, &pq2pci_irqaction);
> return;
> }
> +#endif /* HAVE_OWN_PQ2PCI_IRQ */
Sorry, but I don't quite follow the reason of that. As I see,
you are going to call find_bridges stuff but with demux disabled.
I see no reason to add any defines - if you won't call init_irq,
nothing will happen, I mean demux will not be assigned and so on. BTW,
right now it will not be issued in case of sbc82xx. It is not code-size
optimal, but we'll leave optimizations to arch/powerpc time.
Actually, you'll just have to override map_irq with sbc_ thing after
find_bridges() call.
>
> static int
> pq2pci_exclude_device(u_char bus, u_char devfn)
> _______________________________________________
> Linuxppc-embedded mailing list
> Linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org
> https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded
>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-05-26 8:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-05-25 18:25 [PATCH 2/5] Updates for WRS SBC82xx boards Paul Gortmaker
2006-05-26 8:22 ` Vitaly Bordug [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060526122248.14c6728c@localhost.localdomain \
--to=vbordug@ru.mvista.com \
--cc=linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org \
--cc=p_gortmaker@yahoo.com \
--cc=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).